Where did the towers go?

vickylass By vickylass, 3rd Nov 2014 | Follow this author | RSS Feed | Short URL http://nut.bz/cc4072kz/
Posted in Wikinut>Reviews>Books>Society, Politics & Philosophy

This may be the one million question, but watching and listening to Dr. Wood will give us clues on who made the tallest and strongest built buildings on Earth on September 11.

Where did the towers go?

I have to admit that when the famous Twin Towers collapsed, the horrendus event left me puzzled and bit cold. It was, perhaps, of not having enough information or to the fact that I couldn´t figure out how this could have happened in the heart of financial capitalism.
Say that at first I believed what the official media everywhere had told us, but I went on searching for other points of view, because the event was too horrendus to be believed as it was said.
Thus, I found these series of lectures on the issue by engineer Judy Wood, telling us that what we´d been told is hard to believe, or at least, she, as an engineer on structure and materials, wondered why it could have happened on the very same morning of such an event.
One of her first filmed lectures on the event and on her own research is precisely entitled "Where did the towers go?" She gives us several points that she goes on explaining during her lecture.
1. Lack of debris,
2. The bathtube wasn´t destroyed nor the toilets inside the buildings.
3. The sismic recordings. Here Dr. Wood give us good explainations.
4. Lather.
5. Dust rolled out.
6. Toasted cars.
7. Weird fires.
8. Rolled up carpets.
9. Proof of concept.
10. The weather.
11. Magnetic field.
12. More proof concept and summary.
Her research on such topic items and her explainations give us the idea that it wasn´t what we were told on the media.
She won´t tell us who did it, but analizing the what, where and how may take us to know who did it.

After hearing to her, now I truly believe that this wasn´t as it was said (Islamic guys flying a couple of airplanes to crash against the tallest and strongest buoldings on Earth) For all what she tells us, based on her work as an engineer on structure and materials, we´ll end up thinking that it was an inside job.

(C) Copyright. Vicky Pino. November 3, 2014.


Job, Judy Wood, Lectures, Materials, Structure

Meet the author

author avatar vickylass
Feature article writer whose motto is that inspiration does exist, but it has to meet us at work.

Share this page

moderator Mark Gordon Brown moderated this page.
If you have any complaints about this content, please let us know


author avatar Steve Kinsman
3rd Nov 2014 (#)

It had to be an inside job, according to Architects for 9/11 Truth, a group of over 100 architects and structural engineers who have exhaustively examined the facts and come up with that conclusion.

Reply to this comment

author avatar vickylass
3rd Nov 2014 (#)

It´s what many of us think; State terorism.

Reply to this comment

author avatar Fern Mc Costigan
3rd Nov 2014 (#)

You will never know Vicky, the truth one day surface as Steve is stating!

Reply to this comment

author avatar Retired
4th Nov 2014 (#)

Why do people constantly seek for conspiracies when there is no reason to imagine that such a one existed?

The question to be asked in any case of a criminal happening is - who stood to gain from the crime? If the Two Towers disaster was an "inside job", then you have to ask who benefitted from it?

You should also remember that the two airliners that hit the Towers were only half the picture. The aim of the perpetrators was to destroy the Pentagon and the White House as well - who on the "inside" would have gained from those "hits" as well as those on the towers?

I also have theory that the originators of the plan (in Al-Qaeda) had a mistaken idea about the Towers. I reckon they thought that by attacking the "World Trade Centre" they would destroy "world trade" which, along with destroying much of the American government, would leave the way clear for an Islamic takeover. They failed to do this for several reasons, one being that their targets were simply two massive office blocks that contained the workspaces of dozens of small and medium-sized companies and not what they thought was there.

Reply to this comment

author avatar Mr. Goldstein
5th Nov 2014 (#)

Here is some information Mr. Kinsman may be interested in.

AE911Truth vs Dr. Judy Wood

"When an honest man, honestly mistaken, comes face-to-face with undeniable and irrefutable truth, he is faced with one of two choices, he must either cease being mistaken or cease being honest." - Amicus Solo (Latin for "a lone friend")

If Richard Gage is using AE911Ttruth's funds to buy Dr. Wood's book, and Richard Gage is suppressing Dr. Wood's work, one must conclude that the prime directive of AE911Truth is to suppress the evidence. Mr. Gage cannot refute the overwhelming, conclusive, and indisputable evidence contained in Dr. Wood's book but only misrepresent it (i.e. promote disinformation about it). Science is not determined by popular opinion, but a psyop is. Referring to the sum of 2+3 as "a view" or as "an opinion" or "a theory" is how cover-ups work. It creates doubt where there is no doubt. Humanity has awoken. If you are worthy and willing to open your eyes to the truth, read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood.

Richard Gage and other Liars for 9/11 Truth

Image of check from Richard Gage for Dr. Judy Wood Book


Form 990 ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9-11 TRUTH INC, Part I Summary, 1.) mission statement

Our mission is to research, compile, and disseminate (some) scientific evidence relative to the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, (not all 7, just 3 of the buildings) calling for a truly open and independent investigation and supporting others in the pursuit of justice. (Except Dr. Judy Wood)

Form 990 ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9-11 TRUTH INC, Schedule A, Part II, Section A

from 2008 to 2012 AE911Truth income was $1.365 million!!!


If Mr. Gage was searching for the truth, then he would not be trying to deceive his supporters and the American people by claiming to present the best "scientific forensic evidence", only to completely ignore the large sum of scientific forensic evidence that thermite does not explain. If a scientist or researcher only presented the evidence that supports their hypothesis while completely ignoring the evidence that countered their hypothesis, they could be stripped of their professional license or degree for presenting such an unscientific and biased fraction of the total sum of important physical evidence that demands consideration.

Reply to this comment

author avatar Mr. Goldstein
5th Nov 2014 (#)

Theory, speculation, and belief are not necessary to understand that a type of directed energy was used on 9/11, rather, only detailed study of the empirical evidence from 9/11 is necessary. Situations like this are rare in science, where there is so much empirical evidence that one can bypass theory and speculation to draw an irrefutable conclusion from the evidence. This also helps to illustrate a major difference between Dr. Judy Wood and other 9/11 researchers, as she did not start with theory or speculation and then begin researching to see if it was consistent with the evidence. Instead, Dr. Wood simply did what any objective, vigilant scientist would do, she gathered and studied as much of the empirical evidence from 9/11 as possible, assembling a monumental database of verifiable physical evidence that dwarfs the efforts of any other 9/11 "research", including the unscientific '9/11 Commission Report'. After gathering and studying all of this important evidence, Dr. Wood arrived at the only logical, inescapable conclusion that explains all of this empirical evidence, a general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW). It would be theory or speculation to go beyond that by trying to name a specific weapon technology or location, because that is not what the evidence allows us to irrefutably conclude. This is why the term is left as a general one, because that is the only logical, conclusive, and irrefutable conclusion that the evidence allows us to make.

This download is the Foreword and book review of "WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?" by Eric Larsen, Professor Emeritus at John Jay College of Criminal Justice 1971 - 2006 (35 years), plus the Author's Preface.


Those of us who have read Dr. Wood's book can give at least 10 reasons that rule out the theory by "AE911trutherd" that welding material destroyed the WTC. How many can you list ? Hint: the bottom of page 45, the top of page 171, the diagrams on page 81 and 84, the diagram at the bottom of page 11, and of course pages 122 to 127. The list is endless, actually.

By reading WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?, you know from the EVIDENCE that the Twin Towers turned to dust in mid-air never hitting the ground.

>Bombs don't do that.
>Thermite does not do that.
>Thermate does not do that.
>Nano-enhanced thermite does not do that.
>Nano-thermite does not do that.
>New-and-improved super-duper mini-micro-nano thermite does not do that.
>Firecrackers do not do that.
>Fire does not do that.
>Nukes do not do that.
>Megga nukes do not do that.
>Milli-nukes do not do that.
>Mini-nukes do not do that.
>Nano-nukes cannot do that.
>A wrecking ball cannot do that.
>A slingshot cannot do that.
>Missiles cannot do that.

We know this because we know those things above involve Kinetic Energy and/or Thermal Energy and we know that the "dustification" was done without Kinetic Energy and without Thermal Energy. That is, "dustification" was not done with high heat (Thermal Energy) nor with some form of Kinetic Energy (wrecking ball, projectile, gravity collapse). The building was not cooked to death nor was it beaten to death. So Kinetic Energy Weapons (KEW) did not destroy the buildings nor did Thermal Energy Weapons (TEW) destroy the buildings. But we know that Energy was Directed somehow (and controlled within fairly precise boundaries) to cause the building to turn to dust in mid air. That is, some kind of (cold) Directed Energy that was used as a weapon (cDEW) had to have done this. Energy was directed and manipulated within the material such that it came apart without involving high heat (fire, welding materials such as thermite) and without having something fly through the air and hit it (bullets, missile, bombs, wrecking ball, a giant hammer, or many micro hammers)

If this technology can manipulate energy to do something like this, it can also be manipulated to provide us with "free energy" (i.e. "off the grid"). Simply by looking at the cover of Dr. Wood's book

Reply to this comment

author avatar Mr. Goldstein
5th Nov 2014 (#)

you can realize there must be a technology that can do this. This is evidence that such technology does exist. This is evidence that a technology capable of providing "free energy" ("off the grid") exists. The whole world witnessed this which means the whole world can know that "free-energy technology" exists. This realization will change the world. This is probably the biggest reason why there is so much effort spent misrepresenting, distorting, and suppressing Dr. Wood's research.

Those that choose to focus on hearsay, speculation, conspiracy theories, or unqualified opinions while ignoring irrefutable factual evidence by avoiding it is what keeps a cover-up in place. Diverting the public to arguing between the two false choices of "9/11 Truthers" verses "The Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory" while ignoring the facts is classic perception management designed to hide and obscure the evidence. (Chanting "9/11 Was An Inside Job!" is equivalent to chanting "Yes To Fascism!")

Richard Gage is NOT a qualified forensic scientist. Dr. Judy Wood IS a qualified forensic scientist. AE911Truth is calling for a new investigation. This implies an admission that they are NOT qualified to conduct such an investigation of what happened. Otherwise, why are they calling for a new investigation instead of conducting one themselves -- unless the intention is to knowingly distract its members and others away from the new investigation that has already been conducted? AE911Truth wants a new investigation? They already have one. It's contained in a book called "WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?" Why is AE911Truth suppressing it? AE911Truth cannot lobby Congress. They are a 501( c )3 and are prohibited from lobbying Congress. Why didn't AE911Truth submit their so-called "thermite evidence" to NIST? - Oh, that's right. It's a federal crime to defraud the government. Why hasn't AE911Truth filed a Federal qui tam case? Because they haven't blown the whistle on anything and they have no evidence and it is past the statute of limitation. So, why didn't they support Dr. Wood's Federal qui tam case that was filed instead of banning members who mentioned it? * -- I guess they really didn't want such a case to go forward. So they want "respect and compassion for all people" except for those named "Dr. Judy Wood."

AE911truth first opened their website about 3.5 weeks AFTER Dr. Wood submitted her Request for Corrections (RFC) to NIST. She was the first to submit an RFC that blew the whistle on the contractors for the NIST report. Can you say "damage control" ? Then she filed a federal qui tam case that could have blown this whole case wide open, including putting people under oath - if there were enough supporters. Guess what? It became a policy in AE911Truth to ban those who discussed the work of Dr. Wood in an honest manor. ** Since Richard Gage, founder & CEO of AE911truth, bought Dr. Wood's book in the spring of 2011 and read it, he can no longer use "plausible deniability" as a defense. Mr. Gage is knowingly leading people away from the truth about 9/11 and using AE911Truth funds to accomplish this task. So leading people away from the truth must be the mission of AE911Truth. How else could he justify using AE911Truth funds to buy this book? Who funds AE911Truth? Donations through the donation drives on his site have dried up. However, donating creates a psychological hold on the donor and they are less likely to leave the organization or question Mr. Gage. Dr. Wood is a teacher and promotes independent thinking. Perhaps this is why she does not ask for donations on her website or conduct membership drives for a "truth club" to keep everyone in lockstep, where members are issued a list of talking points to focus on so that they don't go looking for the truth. Dr. Wood is just one person. Richard Gage brags about having a large membership in lockstep with him. So why is he so concerned about just ONE person and radiates such anger at Dr. Wood? The truth is powerful and it emerges through independent thought.

The scientific method, as it came into be

Reply to this comment

author avatar Mr. Goldstein
5th Nov 2014 (#)

being during the Enlightenment period, is a method of thought known as empiricism or as the empirical method. Under the terms of empiricism, all conclusions are, must, and can be drawn from observable evidence and from observable evidence only. Evidence must precede any and every conclusion to be drawn from it. Then, if sound logic governs in the relationship between evidence and the conclusion drawn from it, that conclusion will be irrefutable

Scientists, as all know or should know, proceed in their thinking not according to belief or desired outcome but according solely and only to what the empirical evidence they have gathered, studied, and observed allows them to conclude or makes it inevitable for them to conclude.

This is why Dr. Wood's work is irrefutable. She only presents evidence and an analysis of that evidence. There is no use for a theory in forensic science. Either you know something or you don't. That is why those in charge of a cover up don't want people to look at the evidence in Dr. Wood's book. Dr. Wood does not ask you to believe her. She only wants you to believe yourself and think for yourself and look at the evidence yourself and not argue about opinions of theories of speculation of ideasŠ That is what keeps a cover up in place. Those of us who have read Dr. Wood's book know this to be true.

On 9/11 over a half mile of vertical building height, containing nearly 150 football fields of floor space, was reduced to a near-level field of dust and debris, where rescue workers walked horizontally or rappelled into empty caverns to look for survivors. How was this possible given the standard laws of engineering and physics? The 9/11 Commission Report bypassed this central issue, as did the report of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Contrary to its stated objective of determining 'why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed,' the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) made the stunning admission that it did not investigate how the towers fell. Neither the standard view that the Twin Towers collapsed from fire nor the standard opposition view that they were intentionally detonated by thermite explosives explains the evidence, nor do they follow the laws of engineering and physics. Dr. Wood left Clemson to research the 9/11 conundrum full time, and she has focused her research strictly on physical evidence and scientific principles. WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? provides an understandable, credible, and photo-enhanced summary of Dr. Wood's disturbing findings, which resulted in her lawsuit against the contractors of the NIST report.

Dr. Judy Wood earned a Ph.D. Degree from Virginia Tech and is a former professor of mechanical engineering. She has research expertise in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, deformation analysis, materials characterization and materials engineering science. Her research has involved testing materials, including complex-material systems, in the area of photomechanics, or the use of optical and image-analysis methods to determine physical properties of materials and measure how materials respond to forces placed on them. Her area of expertise involves interferometry.

She taught graduate and undergraduate engineering classes and has authored or co-authored over 60 peer-reviewed papers in her areas of expertise. In the time since 9/11/01, she has applied her expertise in materials science, image analysis and interferometry, to a forensic study of over 40,000 images, hundreds of video clips and a large volume of witness testimony pertaining to the destruction of the WTC complex. Dr. Wood has conducted a comprehensive forensic investigation of what physically happened to the World Trade Center site on 9/11. And, based on her analysis of the evidence she gathered, in 2007, she filed a federal qui tam case for science fraud against the contractors who contributed to the official NIST report about the destruction of the WTC. This case was filed in the US Supreme Court in Dec 2009.

Reply to this comment

author avatar Mr. Goldstein
5th Nov 2014 (#)

To this day, Dr. Wood's investigation is the only comprehensive forensic investigation in the public domain.

*Chapter 31. AE911 "Truth" and Other Sites Again Censor The Evidence 04 Apr 2010
AE911 - Silently Deletes A Petition Signer (pages 297 to 300) of 9/11Finding the Truth - A Compilation of Articles by Andrew Johnson Focused around the research and evidence compiled by Dr. Judy Wood

**In Appendix C, page 238, section C, (Refined searches) of Michael Armenia's book, "Nanomanagement:The Disintegration of a Non-Profit Corporation", the name "Judy Wood" is a search term used to disqualify a person's affiliation with AE911Truth.

Field Interference 013 AE911Truth: A Failure By Design

We reported about Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (ae911truth.org) in episode 16 of our audio reports. We worked for them as their systems administrators for almost two years. As a high-level administrator inside the organization, I witnessed a stunning degree of mismanagement and I was privy to everything; including the stuff that nobody was supposed to see.

Richard Gage and AE911Truth sleep in the same bed with convicted sex offenders?

Manuel (Manny) Badillo from the conference "Investigate Building 7: A Call to Reexamine the Most Important Event of Our Time," held March 26, 2011



US Marine John P DiMatale speaks at Rethink911 Times Square Event 9-11-13


Wake up sheeple. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. Big Brother only has as much power as you grant him. Independent thought is powerful. After reading WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, Charlie Pound of the U. K. produced the song WAKE UP THIS YOUR ALARM! Unless you enjoy being fleeced, leave the opinion herd and read Dr. Wood's book too. It has been over 13 years since a secret technology was used to create terror and mass murder for the sake of imperialism and hegemony based on a fiat money system in its death throes. What are we as a people left with? A published scientific forensic investigation that concludes a type of Directed Energy that was used as a weapon "dustified" the World Trade Center complex and a group of shadowy people determined to suppress that evidence by any means. This is the sad reality that we live in. Wake up!

© 2012 Music, Lyrics, & Vocals by Charlie Pound

BTW...Those who ridicule and marginalize Dr. Judy Wood are promoting the fascist police state that Edward Joseph "Ed" Snowden is alerting us to...

Fascism Anyone?

Does any of this ring alarm bells? Of course not. After all, this is America, officially a democracy with the rule of law, a constitution, a free press, honest elections, and a well-informed public constantly being put on guard against evils. Historical comparisons like these are just exercises in verbal gymnastics. Maybe, maybe not. (Remember that fascist regimes have elections too. Covering it up with a red, white, and blue sticker doesn't make fascism any less despicable. When are people going to wake up and start using the "F" word?)


Reply to this comment

Add a comment
Can't login?